Re: Conlang legal protection (WAS: Conlang music)

Now, that'd be a rule 36, not rule 34.

Get your rules of the Internet straight *shakes cane*

2009/1/9 Sai Emrys <saizai@...>:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Paul Kershaw <ptkershaw@...> wrote:
>>> D'you think there's rule 34 of conlangs?
>> I'd be surprised if there weren't some quantity of documents best suited for
>> Penthouse Forum already written at least partially in Klingon. ;)
>
> But that's *in* conlangs.
>
> I said *of* conlangs. As in, someone somewhere has a fetish for
> conlangs themselves... ;-)
>
> - Sai
>