Re: More Gothic text
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, April 1, 2003, 21:02 |
Roger Mills scripsit:
> The orthography doesn't help either. In Wright's grammar, there are
> diacritics to show the 3 (assumed) pronunciations of "ai" and "au"-- )Bái, aí,
> ai etc. "ei" represents /i:/; there are macrons over various vowels, to
> distinguish long vs. short /o/ for ex.
In fact this is not so much an assumed pronunciation as an artificial one
even more archaic than living 5th-century Gothic. IMHO the Right Thing
is to pronounce e and o as /e/ and /o/, and ai and au as /E/ and /O/ always,
and not worry about macrons over a and u (which are pretty rare anyhow).
--
Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan
portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see jcowan@reutershealth.com
it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, www.ccil.org/~cowan
epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury www.reutershealth.com
at a block of wood make there an image of a cow,
is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus