Marcus Smith wrote:
>H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
>>At first, I thought my conlang was an active language -- and indeed, it
>>does resemble an active language in marking noun cases semantically.
>
>No, definitely not an active language.
Perhaps an active-portmanteaus lang? What I mean is, an
active lang with much more than expected.
>>So my question is... what *is* this system??
>
>The system doesn't correspond to anything I've ever seen in a
>natlang. That's one reason I like it. It's definitely original.
I like it too. Even though the system does not correspond to
anything I myself know, it still seems naturalistic for some
reason. I can't explain it. Perhaps because of its very close
resemblance to an active language.
-kristian- 8)