Re: Hi! Reintroducing myself, and introducing bryatesle
From: | tomhchappell <tomhchappell@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 23:27 |
Hello, and thanks for writing.
I got as far as your secondary cases before writing this reply.
The "reciprocal-object" case looks great for one possible answer to the
questions I and the responders raised on the "Reflexive and Reciprocal
Voices in Ditransitives" thread I started earlier this year (since May
2005).
The "secondary-subject" case looks great for one possible answer to the
questions I and the responders raised on the "Are commands to believe
felicitous?" thread I started earlier this year (also since May 2005).
I would love to know how Bryatesle (is the capital B /not/ OK?)
says "believe", "know", "choose to believe", "come to believe", "come
to know", and similar things.
----------
Thank you.
Tom H.C. in MI
--- In conlang@yahoogroups.com, Markus Miekko <m13kk0@H...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been a member now and then of this list, and for those who don't
> remember me, I am a Finnish Swede, and I study in Turku.
>
> A somewhat obsolete draft of my conlang /br1atesle/ [br_r1AtEs\lE]
can be
> found at
http://www.angelfire.com/music6/miekko/Bryatesle29.6.2005.pdf .
Reply