Re: The Bitha overview
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Thursday, September 30, 1999, 1:39 |
Larry Schelin wrote:
> Bilabal Dental Alvelor Velar
> Ulvular Glottal
> Stop b - d k
> g - ' (?)
So, {g} is a uvular stop? Why not use {q}? That would free {g} up for
/G/.
> Nasal m - - ng
No /n/? That's rather unusual.
> i uu(y) EH(u") u
> e
> a OO(9) ah(A)
What {EH} exactly? Is it an unrounded /u/? Quite an unusual system.
> vidh present tense
>
> vith past tense (basic past, can be any time in the past, no specific
> moment)
> bith (one minute ago)
> dith (one hour ago)
> ngith (yesterday)
> tsith (one week ago)
> jith (one month ago)
> gith (one year ago)
Hmm, I'd say that it was time-i-tense, that is b = one minute, d = one
hour, etc., and -dh = present, -th = past, -sh = future. How do you
handle "ten minutes ago"? Is that "dith"?
> Must -uh-
> Absolutly have to -ugh-
Interesting.
> II v+(infix)+dh(th, sh, etc...)
> Accidentally -ija-
> Purposfully -ira-
> Repeatly -atsi-
> Once -itsa-
> Definatly true -edzi-
> Probably true -adzi-
> Probably false -eshi-
> Definatly false -ashi-
Let me see if I've got this straight, "one minute ago, definitely true"
would be "bedzith"? Can these be combined? Can you say "once,
definitely true"?
> A little bit "trickle" jia-
> Some "flow" za-
> A lot "gush" tse-
> A whole lot "flood" gu-
I don't understand these at all. Please explain.
> (Noun-subject) mi (Verb) (Noun- Indirect object) vidh (Noun- direct
> object)
Interesting. "Mi" can, of course, be "ngi", etc. also, yes?
> I see you (pl.)
> Ju mi eri vidh vithu.
Would "I don't see y'all" be:
Ju ngi eri vidh vithu?
Pretty interesting language, over all.
--
Oh Lord, grant that we may always be right, for thou knowest we will
never change our mind. - Scots Prayer
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files/
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor