Re: Personal Conjugation based on Closeness
|From:||Tristan McLeay <zsau@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, April 2, 2003, 8:33|
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Andreas Johansson wrote:
> Interesting pronunciation of my name, anyways. Anglophones typically supply
> whatever phone they have in "man" for the first syllable; do you have [a] there?
> I do hope [e@] is not meant to be a diphthong!
> The One True and Correct pronunciation is of course [an'dr`e:as]~[an'dr\`e:as].
One true and correct yet you list two?
(I've always been pronouncing it something like [@n"dZr\e:@s]. I'm not
*exactly* sure what that [@] at the start really is; it make be more like
 or [@\]. But it is the closest pronunciation to yours my dialect
would possible support (well, slightly closer than the closest; the
closest would have [e:s] or [e:r\@s] at the end).)
War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.