Re: OT: Programming Languages (Was: Spell Checking for Non European Languages, and for Conlangs)
| From: | David Zitzelsberger <davidz@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, April 1, 2004, 20:48 |
|---|
Didn't the AmigaVision language do this?
Anyway, the underlying format could be text, just have a graphical display.
As you make new modules, they go into libraries. Pehaps a programmer defined
icon could go with it?
-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Caquant [mailto:herodote92@YAHOO.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:19 PM
To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
Subject: Re: OT: Programming Languages (Was: Spell Checking for Non
European Languages, and for Conlangs)
But going back to program packages: how would you use
a tree to represent a subroutine which is called from
many different programs ? Clearly, such a subroutine
couldn't belong to a single branch of the tree. And
what about recurrent functions ?
(I'm not quite sure I understood the point. I think
you meant that, if in the programs there is LOOP for
ex, this could be figured on the screen as a node, and
when you click on the node you expand the LOOP, which
might contain other nodes of lower level, and so on ?)
Reply