|From:||Roger Mills <rfmilly@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 17:08|
Paul Roser wrote:> Piraha is certainly an interesting language. For more on the language and > the controversy surrounding it -- > > Jeffrey Pullum's languagelog has several entries discussing Piraha, > including: > > http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003162.html > http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003162.html > http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004387.html > > (the last one includes discussion about the current debate over this > language) > > Everett's paper for Current Anthropology with comments from a number of > linguists as well as Everett's response is available at: > > http://ldc.upenn.edu/myl/llog/EverettPiraha.pdf > > Suzette Haden Elgin (linguist/scifi writer/conlanger) comments on her > blog: > > http://ozarque.livejournal.com/366196.html?thread=6873204 >I haven't read it yet, but the Apr. 16 issue of the New Yorker also has an article, "The Interpreter" by one Joseph Colapinto. Some nice photos too. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/toc/2007/04/23/toc_20070416 has only the current issue (Apr.23); maybe some of you can figure out if previous issues are also available.
|David J. Peterson <dedalvs@...>|