Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)
From: | Tristan Alexander McLeay <anstouh@...> |
Date: | Friday, December 21, 2001, 7:21 |
--- Andrew Chaney <adchaney@...> wrote:
> ObConlang: If your language has a native alphabet, does it include archaic
> spellings and such like -ough, kn-, etc?
Yuppy! All the time. Practically every word... It's worse than English in that
regard (although completely and utterly regular in text-to-speech). Some of it
is probably regarded as more similar to English's `long' vowels (like <ee>=/i:/
and <o*e>=/8u/ (etc.), not vowels like /A:/ and /i:/), but there are a number
of oddities like the -ough and kn-.
Tristan
http://greetings.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Greetings
- Send your festive greetings online!