Re: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
From: | JS Bangs <jaspax@...> |
Date: | Friday, April 26, 2002, 23:49 |
Christian Thalmann sikyal:
> Question:
>
> - Do you find the description of the cases and their uses
> comprehensible and/or intuitive?
Uh, no. You spend a while describing the various syntactic variants of
cases, but I couldn't find any explanation of what the difference between
Predicative and Objective was. Most of your examples are what would be
Indirect Object and Direct Object in English, or Accusative/Dative in
Greek or Latin. Was that your intent?
> - Can you think of situations where this case system would fail or
> produce problems?
Not really, although I don't really understand what semantic motivations
you're using to distinguish the two object cases. I do like the examples
where you use the different cases to show general v. specific action, but
I wonder if those might cause problems in other situations.
Other comments--
You wrote:
"If for some reason we want to highlight an explicit subject, we can
mention it first as an independent verbless statement (which I call a
topic declaration), and then follow up with an implicit verb V P O / V O P
structure:
Torav, lonna u lawne i fele.
Man:d sing:3i PRE song:i OBJ woman:d
Lit.: "The man. Sings-he a song to the woman."
The man, he sings a song to the woman.
Note that in this case, |torav| is the topic declaration, which should be
considered as a statement of its own, and not part of the sentence |Lonna
u lawne i fele.|"
This is a very natural feature, but your description of it is very odd.
Why should we consider "torav" to be part of a different sentence? It's
much simply and linguistically more accurate to say that there is a
pre-verbal focus, and that any element receiving particular emphasis can
be moved to that position. Such is a very common thing,
cross-linguistically.
Jesse S. Bangs jaspax@u.washington.edu
"If you look at a thing nine hundred and ninety-nine times, you are
perfectly safe; if you look at it the thousandth time, you are in
frightful danger of seeing it for the first time."
--G.K. Chesterton