Re: Question about Romlangs/CeltiConlangs
| From: | bnathyuw <bnathyuw@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, August 19, 2002, 11:56 |
|---|
--- J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> wrote: > In a
message dated 08/18/2002 01.54.10 PM, IJzeren
> Jan writes:
>
> >Are your languages really 100 % a posteriori, or
> did you introduce a priori
> >elements (words, grammar) as well? Just curious.
>
reminds be of a bad philosophy joke :
X claims to argue a priori
Y says X is arguing a posteriori
I think they're both arguing ex posteriori
hmmph.
anyway,
bn
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com