Re: Question about Romlangs/CeltiConlangs
From: | J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...> |
Date: | Monday, August 19, 2002, 1:53 |
In a message dated 08/18/2002 01.54.10 PM, IJzeren Jan writes:
>Are your languages really 100 % a posteriori, or did you introduce a priori
>elements (words, grammar) as well? Just curious.
Creolego * is a mixture of _a posteriori_ (Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, PIE,
Germanic, English, Japanese, etc.) and some _a priori_ based on the _a
posteriori_ or whim(sy).
As I have posted in the past, root-creation IMHO is one of the more "fun"
aspects of the general lingua-manglin' fun of conlangin' ;)
In some circles (academic and otherwise), _a posteriori_ is called
"motivated root-creation" and _a priori_ is called - appropriately -
"ex-nihilo root-creation."
* /kreo.lego/ not /kre.ol.go/ ;)
€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€ø,¸¸,ø€º°`°º€€º°`°º€ø,¸~->
Hanuman Zhang, 3-Toed-Sloth-Style Gungfu Typist ;)
"the sloth is a chinese poet upsidedown" --- Jack Kerouac {1922-69}
--------------------------------------------------
"There is no reason for the poet to be limited to words, and in fact the
poet is most poetic when inventing languages. Hence the concept of the poet
as 'language designer'." --- O. B. Hardison, Jr.
"La poésie date d' aujour d'hui." (Poetry dates from today)
"La poésie est en jeu." (Poetry is in play)
--- Blaise Cendrars
"...Poetry is perhaps the only insurance we've got against the vulgarity of
the human heart..." ~ Joseph Brodsky
Reply