Re: conculture
From: | William Annis <annis@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 16, 2001, 14:29 |
>From: J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...>
>
> What do ya peeps call a conlang that is geared towards creating a
>possible real subculture?
Esperanto?
Perhaps Klingon. :)
Has anyone ever done this? I know some Neopagan groups
occasionally indulge in dead language Revivals (a la modern Hebrew),
but I can't think of anyone creating a language with the exress goal
of creating a subculture.
> I am kinda in favour of _xenocultural conlang_ or
>_xenolang_ for short. Or _paracultural conlang_/_paralang_. (AFAIK this is
>different from an artlang)
Hmm. To me a word like paralang would just be another term
for 'argot' or 'jargon' though I admit my mind isn't quite able to get
a handle on what *exactly* 'paracultural' means.
Perhaps I'll create a liturgical language when I get my cult
going...
--
William Annis - System Administrator - Biomedical Computing Group
"When men are inhuman, take care not to feel towards them as they do
towards other humans." Marcus Aurelius VII.65
Replies