Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Language change among immortals

From:Roger Mills <rfmilly@...>
Date:Wednesday, November 23, 2005, 18:27
Tom Chappell wrote:
> > [snip] > > Ah heck, Roger, I should have read your post before I posted mine! > You'd already said that -- I didn't need to say it again.
Oh well, that happens... I wrote:
> > Personally I feel it takes quite a jolt for a person's language to > > change noticeable within their lifetime. (Excluding emigration to a > > foreign country, of course.) The principal factor would be exposure > > to a dialect that is perceived as more prestigious than one's own. > > OK, here I quite disagree. > > (Let's leave aside, for the moment, the fuzzy question of whether > moving from Texas to Michigan counts as "emigrating to a foreign > country".)
Some would say...;-))) In my reply to Dirk Elzinga, I amended that "prestigious" to "normative (for a given region/occupation/status)"
> > I agree that exposure to a dialect that, in some ways and in some > circumstances, seems attractive, is either the "principal factor", or > at least the biggest one I can think of. > > The thing is, "seems attractive" doesn't mean "is perceived as > prestigious" -- not even if you vary who does the "perceiving" and > what constitutes "prestige".
True enough. "Normative" I think fits better. No one want to stick out like a sore thumb. The protruding nail gets hammered down. This would be the case of PhD's brother who moved to Georgia (Yankee accents aren't popular down there-- and vice versa too, or course). In fact the particular exs. I had in mind when I used "prestigious" involved the various Southerners I knew in NYC days, who were in high-status areas like banking, publishing, and brokerage, almost all of whom, in short order, had adopted (with varying success!) an upper-class "Larchmont Lockjaw" accent. Or even myself, nerdy midwesterner shipped off at age 15 to a hoity-toity Eastern prep school, then Harvard-- at the end of which I had something resembling the stereotypical Harvard accent (mostly lost now, since I didn't stay in that environment, physically or mentally ;-)) ).
> > If I suddenly find myself having to talk over a tinny intercom a lot, > or over a staticky radio, I may find Sealane English or CB slang > becoming very attractive, and using the "military alphabet", just > because it is a very quick way to make myself clear without having to > repeat (by the way, use "say again", not "repeat"). > > If I suddenly find myself having to help a large number of just- > toilet-trained and almost-toilet-trained post-toddlers negotiate the > path to the bathroom, I will find it useful to adopt the vocabulary > they use, no matter what vocabulary is used in the pathology lab in > the hospital or the zoologists' office at the zoo.
Ah, but you wouldn't be likely to tell your urologist, "My pee-pee (weenie, thingy etc.) hurts...." These to my view, are exs. of _register_, which we all do, whatever our dialect. Most of us probably write differently here than in a chatty post to parents or friends. We don't talk to the repairman at the garage the same way we talk to the mortgage banker, to a professional colleague, to the doctor etc.
> > It so happens that habits acquired in one environment will become the > most accessible behaviors in another environment. When I need to ask > my daughter or my wife or my brother to repeat what they just said, > I, now, always say, "say again?". Also, certain "linguisticsisms" > are finding their way into my daily speech now, even though I have no > friends nor family with whom I can discuss this subject by voice, > instead of in type. And, long ago, mathematical, musical, > scientific, and cybernetic terminology and ways of seeing things -- > "sorry, my mind was paged out" -- were coming into my speech, > although I made more of an effort to think of something else if I was > sure my audience wouldn't understand.
To me, these are exs. of transferring "jargon" from some specialized area into ordinary speech.
> > These all apply to differences that would constitute "dialect", > rather than "accent". I change my "accent" just to be understood. >
Casually meeting a southerner or a Bostonian, I don't change my pronunciation for that occasion. OTOH, if I moved to Alabama or (back!!) to Boston, (and were a lot younger :-(( ) I'd probably eventually adapt my speech, to some degree at least, to the local norms.
> (and even if *these* folks call the Great Lakes "The 3rd Coast", > people from Galveston and Noo Awlins know the Gulf of Mexico is the > _real_ "3rd Coast".)
You may have missed the foofaraw a few years back, when the realtors out here decided to call us "The White Coast". Lasted about a week, even after they announced that they merely meant the color of the sand on our beaches..........