Re: A phonology
| From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:20 |
|---|
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Thomas R. Wier wrote:
> (What's Anadewism? I'm an oldtimer here, but some of the new "lingo" here
> is not always self-evident. I'm assuming this is related to maggelity
> somehow.)
A natlang always does (it) even worse. Acronymified. And getting an -ism
at the end.
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
-- Snoopy
Replies