Re: A phonology
| From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, July 28, 2003, 12:47 |
|---|
En réponse à Tristan McLeay :
>On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Thomas R. Wier wrote:
>
> > (What's Anadewism? I'm an oldtimer here, but some of the new "lingo" here
> > is not always self-evident. I'm assuming this is related to maggelity
> > somehow.)
>
>A natlang always does (it) even worse. Acronymified. And getting an -ism
>at the end.
Well, the official deacronymification is actually "a natlang already did it
except worse"+ism, but yours was close enough ;)) . Isn't there somewhere
on the web a lexicon of the new Conlang-list technical vocabulary? :)) I
thought there was, but Google finds nothing :( . Maybe something to add to
the Conlang Wiki...
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.
Reply