Re: A phonology
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Friday, July 25, 2003, 22:01 |
Quoting JS Bangs <jaspax@...>:
> Thomas R. Wier sikyal:
>
> > Quoting "Thomas R. Wier" <trwier@...>:
> >
> > > Quoting Roger Mills <romilly@...>:
> > > > Still, mightn't there be a tendency to reanalyze a word like
> > > up.a > u.pa??
> > >
> > > FWIW, no such language exists TMK.
> >
> > I meant: no language exists which divides /upa/ as [up.a].
>
> My phonology teachers always claimed that English always divides /N/ to be
> a coda, so that "singer" should be [siN.r=]. There's some acoustic
> evidence for this, too.
You mean it's not ambisyllabic?
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637
Reply