Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: A phonology

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Friday, July 25, 2003, 22:01
Quoting JS Bangs <jaspax@...>:

> Thomas R. Wier sikyal: > > > Quoting "Thomas R. Wier" <trwier@...>: > > > > > Quoting Roger Mills <romilly@...>: > > > > Still, mightn't there be a tendency to reanalyze a word like > > > up.a > u.pa?? > > > > > > FWIW, no such language exists TMK. > > > > I meant: no language exists which divides /upa/ as [up.a]. > > My phonology teachers always claimed that English always divides /N/ to be > a coda, so that "singer" should be [siN.r=]. There's some acoustic > evidence for this, too.
You mean it's not ambisyllabic? ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637

Reply

JS Bangs <jaspax@...>