Re: About Romance natlangs and conlangs (Re: ) (LONG)
| From: | Josh Roth <fuscian@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, November 19, 1999, 2:13 |
|---|
In a message dated 11/18/1999 6:43:33 PM, fortytwo@GDN.NET writes:
>> imperfect (used for the progressive and/or habitual past): widely
>used
>> in all the Romance languages I know (French, Spanish and Italian), it
>is
>> generally very regular.
>
>Indeed, IIRC, the only irregular imperfects in Spanish are _ir_ and
>_ser_.
One more - "ver" (ve=EDa) :-)
Josh Roth
http://members.aol.com/fuscian