Re: THEORY: clicks
| From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, March 24, 2003, 23:01 |
|---|
From: "Isaac Penzev" <isaacp@...>
> Hehe. Ideas are hanging in the air. I've just introduced /q_>/ (together
> with /t_>/, /ts_>/ and /tS_>/) into my newest project CLP04 (provisional
> name - L'sanu). But maybe in case of /q_>/ I'd make a choice in favor of
> plain /k_>/. They originate from Proto-Semitic emphatic consonants.
And don't forget the original sound of Arabic <d.>, which was the emphatic
form of Hebrew <s'> (sin): /tK_>/. Also, some reconstructions of
Proto-Afrasian have /k_>/, /k_>_w/, /q_>/ and /q_>_w/!
What's the best way to indicate both ejectivity and labialization with
X-SAMPA anyway?
Replies