Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: questions about Arabic

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Wednesday, March 21, 2001, 15:10
En réponse à Eric Christopherson <rakko@...>:

> > But I think */kawana/ had already lost the /w/ by the time of the > Qur'an, or > else it would be written with a waw. >
I agree with you, though I wonder if by the time of the Qoran the verb was already pronounced /ka:na/ or still /kO:na/.
> > This > > looks quite correct knowing that the main meanings of the derived form > n°2 is > > intensification or repetition of the action, or factitive ("to > compose" looks > > quite correct as factitive of "to be", doesn't it?). > > Quick question: What's the difference between factitive and causative? >
For what I know, those two words are interchangeable, though some people make a difference between causative and factitive on account that the subject of a factitive must be animate (agent), while the subject of a causative can be inanimate (cause). I don't know of any language that has distinct forms for the factitive and the causative though. There must be one though: there's always one :))) . Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr