Nik wrote:
> Question: About this, and German's, <ue> convention, does actual <ue>
> not exist in German? Because it seems to me that if it did, there coul=
d
> be confusion over whether <ue> meant <u"> or "really" <ue>, as can
> happen at times with the <nn> for <n~> convention in ASCII-fied Spanish=
;
> <nn> is found at times in words, where the prefix in- is added to a wor=
d
> starting with n- (which is why some use <ny> for <n~>).
Well. Actually <ny> is also found... well, all two letter combinations I=
've
seen for <=F1> (<n~>) have this flaw, lets say:
nn (Old Spanish convention): like "anno" /aJo/ or "innovar" /inoBar/
ny (Catalan convention): like "anyo" /aJo/ or "inyectar" /inj\ektar/
gn (French/Italian convention): like "agno" /ajo/ or "gnomo" /nomo/ or
"i'gneo" /iGneo/
ni: like "anio" /aJo/ or "Sonia" /so.nja/
(where /J/ is the palatal nasal and /j\/ is the palatal fricative)
-- Carlos Th