Re: CHAT: Plus ca change...
|From:||Dan Sulani <dan_sulani@...>|
|Date:||Wednesday, January 20, 1999, 17:14|
Back to translating "Plus ca change...":
if translated more or less literally into rtemmu,
it would read:
inakehs duhl zuv kuhvuh auag g~am kehs duhl.
i = speaker
na = subjective change, normal speed
kehs = objective change, normal speed
duhl = it
zuv = objective change, too slow to notice
kuhvuh = more
auag = assertion (literally: au - imperative, ag -
add to the previous)
g~am = not
But "g~am kehs" makes no sense in rtemmu. In the rtemmu world-view,
all things constantly change. Thus, every content word describes a
changing process and its rate of change is expressed grammatically. To
try to negate change is ungrammatical.
Perhaps, one could use the following saying:
inazuv gzag zuv dzuz mun fis xdil zuv kuhvuh,
augbu zuv aslr` zuv g~amshye, pasho`.
= The bees are busier, but there is still no honey.
gzag = group; dzuz = bee; fis = objective, fast change; xdil =
procedure; mun = connective word;
augbu = but (literally, au = imperative, gbu = oppose;); aslr` =
honey; g~amshye = nothing;
pasho` = yet;
likehsna rtem zuv tikuhnuh auag inuvuz vaka'a.
A word is an awesome thing.
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com