Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: New Language

From:Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...>
Date:Friday, July 16, 1999, 3:27
Nik Taylor wrote:
> The last few days, I've been sketching out a new language, the Traders' > Language (kok Nak zox li"mbu).
Which should be kok Nak zox Li"mbu. _Lim_ means "Trader" (not "one who trades", but rather, a member of the Trading People, "one who trades" is _pe"gni"wak_, from _pegni-_ "one who" and _wak_, "to trade". A trader is a caste in the Trading People, but the whole race is referred to as Traders by most other peoples.
> Nouns have two cases, nominative and oblique.
The oblique, incidentally, derived from the genetive and the accusative in the older language. In Old Traderslang, plural was indicated by -i, while genetive was -a and accusative was -u; the plurals of those were -ya and -yu (later -a: and -u:) respectively. The consonant mutations are caused by being intervocalic. Thus, the old _peki_ (persons) became _pexu_ in the acc. singular and _pexu:_ in the acc. plural; when short final vowels were lost, word-final consonants changed. All stops and fricatives became voiceless, while -w and -y became -f (thru -v) and -ch (thru -jh). Between vowels, nasals became nasal-stop sequences (but -mbi, -mba, and -mbu all became -m, as with all nasals), stops to fricative, voiced fricatives to approximates (thus gh --> y; when -u/-a were lost, then -y became -ch), while voiceless fricatives were voiced. Later, long vowels were shortened, and the genetive plural was absorbed into the accusative plural.
> Cases are indicated by particles. The following cases use the oblique > form of the noun: > Accusative: ne" > Genetive: zo > Dative: ve" > Benefactive: ne" > The following use the nominative form, and have seperate singular and > plural forms > Commitative: cho/cho" > Instrumental: fle"/fle > Passive agent: ga/ga"
These were originally prepositions, some taking genetive, some accusative, and some nominative.
> General (no meaning): -x
From _kog_ meaning "the"
> This: -n(ta)/-n(ta")
From -m, which in turn was from mak (this) + -ta (here)
> That near: -f(a)/-f(a")
From -fwa from -f, which in turn was from pin (that near) (Vpin --> Vfin --> Vf) plus -wa (there)
> That far: -vno/-vno"
Oops, should've been -vne"/-vne From -fne < -f + ne (yonder)
> The: -s
From _sol_ (yon)
> That near: pinwa
Er, that should be _pinwa"_ -- "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any thing till they were sure it would offend no body, there would be very little printed" - Benjamin Franklin http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files/ http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/Books.html ICQ #: 18656696 AIM screen-name: NikTailor