Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question)
From: | Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> |
Date: | Saturday, March 8, 2008, 5:45 |
On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:36 AM, Tristan McLeay wrote:
>
> The insuperable problem is that unfortunately OpenType, the main
> modern
> font format, doesn't support all its features everywhere. Automatic
> ligatures apparently don't happen if the unligated characters are in
> the PUA. Another problem is that Latin handwriting fonts can't
> use context-sensitive glyphs the way Arabic fonts do (for instance, my
> cursive p and b are open when a letter follows, but closed when they
> don't --- you can't tell an OpenType font to automatically do that).
How is it that such a font can produce ligatures when e.g. <f> is
followed by <i> or <fl>, but not vary the look of <p> and <b>
depending on what follows?
Replies