Question: 'mperie' < lat. 'imperium'
From: | Henrik Theiling <ht@...> |
Date: | Monday, February 26, 2007, 23:26 |
Hi!
I have a question of what you'd think would be the most likely status
in phonotatics of nasal+stop clusters after a specific sound shift.
I will explain:
As I mentioned last week already, I intend to drop initial unstressed
/i/ in my new romlang. This changes the set of existing initial
clusters, of course. Let's assume for simplicity that we will deal
additionally with nasal+stop clusters as in 'mperie' < IMPERIUM.
Now, I will also allow for the preposition 'in' to collapse to only
'n' before vowels and before stops, so that we get the same additional
clusters here, too: nasal+stop. E.g.:
in Rome - in Rome
n'Talie - in Italy
My question is: how would the syllable structure most likely behave?
Will 'mperie' be two syllables: /mpe.rje/ ({i} in {ie} looses one
syllable anyway, that's not my question)? Or will it be three:
/m=.pe.rje/? What this be different if the nasal stems from the previous
word as in 'n'Talie': /n=.ta.lje/ or /nta.lje/?
And if a vowel precedes a word with an initial nasal+stop, will the
nasal be moved to the previous syllable: 'ku mperie' /kum.pe.rje/ or
/ku.mpe.rje/ or /ku.m=.pe.rje/? The decision is influential since
open and closed syllables select different vowel allophones:
/kum.pe.rje/ = [kUm.pe:.rje:]
/ku.mpe.rje/ = [ku:.mpe:.rje:]
/ku.m=.pe.rje/ = [ku:.m=.pe:.rje:]
In case you think that /mpe/ is one syllable and will stay so if a
vowel precedes, what effect would you think does this have on medial
clusters? Would the syllable structure be changed by analogy and
e.g. 'kanta' would not be /kan.ta/ anymore but /ka.nta/?
I don't know what has happened in Sicilian. I only see that they
*write* initial nasals -- I have never heard it, nor have I seen any
descriptions of this level of detail. So if you know more, please
share!
Bye,
Henrik
Reply