Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Word usage in English dialects // was Slang, curses and vulgarities

From:Tristan McLeay <conlang@...>
Date:Thursday, February 3, 2005, 10:17
On 3 Feb 2005, at 8.59 pm, J. 'Mach' Wust wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:15:27 +1100, Tristan McLeay > <conlang@...> wrote: > >> Indeed, like eating a cow. The distinction is much the same :) It's >> only natural that something should fill the void left by the loss of >> the Norman-derived word beginning with p- that I can't remember. > > Poulet, I suppose (a common word in Switzerland, only for the meat, > not for > the animal, and of course pronounced in a Swiss fashion: /'p:ule/).
Probably _pullet_ in English, and I imagine it'd be pronounced englishly like 'pull it' or to rhyme with 'mullet'... and indeed the dictionary includes that word, but it's specifically limited to young chooks. Adrian Morgan:
> It's the same as "should" in the sense of "Would you approve of this > course of action?" except that it also implies a promise that if you > say yes then I will.
I'm not sure where the 'should' is in 'Would you approve of this course of action?', I suppose you edited it out at some stage...
> Besides, "shall" is easier to say than "should" :-)
I think you'll find it hard to prove that!
> An example in dialogue might be: > > "So, do you have anything planned for tea?" > "Er, no I don't, but shall I go down the shop and get a chicken?" > "Yeah, sounds good to me."
here, wait, was the missing 'to' between 'down' and 'the' in your earlier post not an error then? I assumed it was---in fact, I read it in, so to speak, because I wasn't proofreading. Stop breaking the language! God gave us prepositions for a reason---to prepose---so do it, damnit!
> Only I and we. You can't really make implied promises on behalf of > other people. :-)
Yeah, but I didn't know it was an implied promise, did I? I was aware that there's a prescriptivist rule about using 'shall' in the first person and 'will' in the second and third though...
> Naturally, I'm surprised that you'd be surprised.
I don't see why you should be, it seems like a very limited word. Only used in questions with first-person subjects. Easy to fall out of use. Anyway, I don't use it. I'm surprised that Andreas reckons he was told that 'shall''s only used in questions and the bible; I thought it was only used in the KJV. -- Tristan.

Replies

Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...>
Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>