| From: | João Ricardo de Mendonça <somnicorvus@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 3:15 |
How do you evaluate a conlang? How do you define a "good" or a "bad" conlang? I understand this is a personal criteria, so I'm not looking for a definitive answer. I just wanted to know other people's opinions on this. João Ricardo de Mendonça
| Peter Bleackley <peter.bleackley@...> | |
| Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> | |
| Remi Villatel <maxilys@...> | |
| Mia Soderquist <happycritter@...> | |
| 轡虫 (kutsuwamushi) <snapping.dragon@...> |