Re: sound change question
From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 22, 2003, 10:05 |
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Christophe Grandsire wrote:
> >That doesn't look nice in uppercase, however. Except perhaps with a very
> >well designed OpenType font.
>
> \~W looks OK in LaTeX. The letter is a bit wide for the tilde, but then you
> can use the mathematical wide tilde by $\widetilde{\mathrm{W}}$. But that's
> a bit overkill :))) (you can do the same with the small w if you find the
> tilde too small even in this case. \widetilde{} adapts to the width of the
> character under it).
You could have it automatically replace 'mh' and 'Mh' with widetilde-ws,
though. That would simplify the incredible length of
$\widetilde{\mathrm{w}}$. Unfortuantely, I don't know how to do it :)
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>
Yesterday I was a dog. Today I'm a dog. Tomorrow I'll probably still
be a dog. Sigh! There's so little hope for advancement.
-- Snoopy
Reply