Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Looking for a new grammatical term

From:Muke Tever <hotblack@...>
Date:Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 5:42
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 05:35:52 +0200, Remi Villatel <maxilys@...> wrote:
> My conlang, Shaquelingua, has two kinds of possession: alienable possession > and inalienable possession. > > I just use the terms "possession" and "possessive" for the alienable possession. > > And I used "partition" and "partitive" for the inalienable possession. It > sounded good --because of the root "part"-- to mean "part of". > > A recent thread on the list made me realize that my use of the adjective > "partitive" was very confusing. It's close... but not so close from the > usual meaning. > > So, do you have some ideas for a new term? Well, two new terms: a name and > an adjective. I exhausted all my tank of imagination on "partitive" and I > can't find anything better.
Suggestion: What's your native lang's terms for them? In one of my langs (Trentish) there are alienably and inalienably possessed[1] nouns... The collective of things that are alienably (or optionally) possessed are called |apen| /Ap_>en/ "inventory, possessions"[2]. There should be a word corresponding to inalienable [inherent] possession but I don't think I ever got around to making it (and I can't run my root generator ATM). *Muke! [1] Actually, I think it may technically be inherently/optionally possessed--I've lost all my notes on the system, and will probably have to rebuild it... [2] If the system _is_ inherent/optional, then |apen| itself will be inherently possessed, even though it refers to a set of optionally possessed things :p -- website: http://frath.net/ LiveJournal: http://kohath.livejournal.com/ deviantArt: http://kohath.deviantart.com/ FrathWiki, a conlang and conculture wiki: http://wiki.frath.net/

Replies

Muke Tever <hotblack@...>
Remi Villatel <maxilys@...>