Re: B-Sh has subject pronouns!
From: | andrew <hobbit@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, September 10, 2002, 2:00 |
On 09/09 13:58 Clint Jackson Baker wrote:
> [no Beddel-shaedhem greeting yet...]
> Was doodling about in Ethics class and came up with my
> pronouns, roughly based on OE. (looks better with all
> the edhs and ligatures and all....)
>
> SING
> 1st ic /Ik/
> 2nd the /Te/ for people
> De /de/ for God
> 3rd he /he/ masc
> she /Se/ fem
>
> PL
> 1st wic /wIk/
> 2nd dhe /De/
> 3rd ce /ke/ masc
> che /tSe/ fem
>
> UNIVERSAL (to be explained later....)
> 1st bhic /vIk/
> 2nd te /te/
> 3rd ge /ge/
>
No neuter or common gender in the third person, except possibly in the
universal pronouns. Does that mean that this language has grammatical
gender then?
More doodling please...
- andrew.
--
Andrew Smith, Intheologus hobbit@griffler.co.nz
alias Mungo Foxburr of Loamsdown
http://hobbit.griffler.co.nz/homepage.html
It was a species which often considered itself to be, basically, a race
of divinely inspired toolmakers; any intelligent entity from Arcturus
would instantly have perceived them to be, basically, a race of
impassioned after-dinner speech-makers.
- Walter Miller Jr, A Canticle for Leibowitz