Re: Relexes Pt. 1: Defence
From: | Andreas Johansson <andjo@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 16:51 |
Quoting Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>:
> Actually, now that I think about it, there's a good reason for not
> creating the conlang list private language -- it would fall into the
> IAL category.
Well, a private language, in the sense intended here, is rather an anti-IAL,
isn't it? It prevents communication between different groups rather the helps
it.
On the subject of irony, has there been any studies of tech-talk and
similar "private languages" in Esperanto?
Andreas