Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang
From: | Tristan McLeay <zsau@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 14, 2003, 20:16 |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Paul Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:25:56 +0100, Andreas Johansson <andjo@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Roger Mills <romilly@...>:
> >
> >> Paul Bennett wrote:
> >> > > FWIW, in UTF-8 it's
> >> diÃÆÃââââ¬Ã¦ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¾ÃÆÃââââ¬Ã¦ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâúÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâïn
> >>
> >> dÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâémaphsep
> >> /diÃÆÃââââ¬Ã¦ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâùÃÆÃâ
> >> âââ‰â¢ÃÆÃââââ¬Ã°ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâèn
> >> > > dÃÆÃââââ¬Ã°ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬ÃâúmÃÆÃââââ¬Ã°ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¹Ã
âfsep/
[snip]
>
> This is a far from satisfactory situation. My only thought is that Opera is
> in some way broken, but that wouldn't explain why some people receive my
> posts OK and some don't.
Well, the explanation for that would be that each time you send a message,
it's getting progressively worse; you're sending what you can see, which
is broken. (I'm not sure if you can tell what I've quoted above, but it's
much longer than the other post (but I can't see Unicode in this mail
client anyway).)
--
Tristan.