Re: Further language development Q's
From: | Carsten Becker <naranoieati@...> |
Date: | Thursday, September 16, 2004, 13:43 |
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:31:48 +0200, Carsten Becker
<naranoieati@...> wrote:
>2) Ayeri is a trigger language, that means fluid-S AFAIK.
> The topic of a sentence can be any argument of a verb.
> So is it possible, that one daugher language can
> develop an nom/acc system and another one an abs/erg
> system? I haven't found a tendency in Ayeri to one
> of both ends yet, though. But I think because at least
> the one standard version I have until now has no real
> passive construction, it would tend to be accusative,
> although there is a causative that makes some kind of
> passive constructions possible: manáo -> manaisa
> (to invent, v. -> invented, adj.)
What about this one?