Re: Question
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 24, 1999, 21:26 |
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Nik Taylor wrote:
> In my ancestral language, Old Kassi', there was a suffix, -(h)e', that I
> call "completive". It indicates that the verb is "completed". Some
> examples are piha's (learn), pihase' (know); ke"lo's (stab), ke"lose'
> (stab to death). Is that a legitimate term, or should I use another
> term?
As far as I know, that's a a valid term. It's like the Old English prefix
ge-, which sometimes has a completive purpose (and sometimes, no purpose
at all).
Although it's also a bit like the Hebrew qittol which has an emphatic
meaning.