Re: Question
From: | Charles <catty@...> |
Date: | Sunday, August 22, 1999, 16:04 |
Artem Kouzminykh wrote:
>
> In the end, I wonder does anybody knows something about such
> con(art)langs:
> 1) "Philosophical" conlang based on (only) Romance root;
> 2) A Romance-Slavic conlang. It would exist, for example, if Roman
> Empire would conquer in 3-6 centuaries the territories there the
> ancestors of the modern slavic peoples lived, as it conquered Italy,
> Spain, Helvetia, Britannia, Gallia (France) (a bit of alternative
> history).
I think they would have kept at least 5 cases, maybe added more.
No prepositions or transition to SVO word order, just SOV.
Perhaps even an innovation of some agglutinative word endings,
due to areal influence of early Finnish. No analytical tenses!