Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Futurese

From:Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>
Date:Tuesday, May 7, 2002, 7:33
Javier wrote in response to John Cowan:
> >I think the point is that you are constraining your IAL based on > >the majority of (described) languages rather than the majority of > >speakers. > > > >> Why do you call them "classical"? Because they're the > >> vowels of the "classical" language Latin? > > > >No, because they are the five vowels representing the most common > >pattern cross-linguistically, and are "classically" found in IALs. > >If those five vowels are "classically" found in IALS >is 1) because most IALs are Latin-based, and 2) because >those are the five "classic" vowels of the Roman alphabet >('y' is not considered a classic vowel since it was >used only for Greek borrowings). > >Above you're asking for languages to be weighed according >to their number of speakers, but then you ask the >pentavocalic system to be adopted by the IAL, apparently >ignoring that it is not used by most of those languages >with most speakers: Chinese doesn't use it, nor English, >nor Arabic, nor Hindi, nor French, nor Portuguese, nor >Indonesian, nor Turkish... only Spanish and Russian among >the most spoken and widespread languages use it. Aren't you >contradicting yourself a bit here?
You ARE aware that John Cowan and I aren't the same person?!? John is right about what I meant with "democracy of languages" vs "democracy of speakers", but I didn't actually use the term "classical vowels" in the way John thinks. "Classical vowels"=/i e a o u/ is simply a usage I've picked up from others - I've always assumed it refers to Latin. Andreas _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx