Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: OT-ish: txt - Could it replace Standard Written English?

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Friday, March 7, 2003, 15:24
En réponse à John Cowan <cowan@...>:

> > Learning writing top-down, content before form, is a very powerful > technique with all human beings. >
"Top-down" looks suspiciously like the French "méthode globale" which has been used since my generation to teach writing to children. If it's the same, then I really can't agree with you. The method which was used before was really a "bottom-up" method and worked extremely well: my mother for instance, although she stopped going to school at the age of 12, can read and write better than most of my former fellow students of university level! And she is not afraid to read or write at all, on the contrary! On the other hand, in my generation I'm an exception as being someone who can write correctly and clearly and who loves to read (and an exception as one who managed to learn a foreign language). The "méthode globale" has already ruined a generation of children who hardly have any idea how to read and write French, and it's on its way to ruin a second generation. Attempts to reintroduce the former method have all proven successful, but were blocked by political choice (this is a very sensitive issue in French education, hence our important experience in it which allows me to give a definite conclusion about it). Tens of studies about the results of a "bottom-up" and a "top-down" way of teaching writing have been carried on in France, and have all shown without exception that the "top-down" method produces many more functionally illiterate people than the "bottom-up" method, while the "bottom-up" method always succeeds *without hindering people's creativity or will to read and write*. And if you want another proof, here it is: the level of functional illiteracy among people of my parents' generation in France (those who followed the previous method to learn to write) is less than 5%. On the other hand, the level of illiteracy in people of my generation is about 15% and the same level is found currently among children who arrive in High School. The level is only slightly higher in poor suburbs, showing that it is *not* a social problem. It is really a problem linked to the method of learning. Sorry for ranting, but I just find it hard to believe that there are still people advocating a top-down method for learning writing for children, when so many studies and years of experience have proven that it's not successful and actually creates more functional illiteracy. Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Replies

John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Tristan <kesuari@...>