Re: another silly phonology question
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, November 29, 2000, 1:05 |
Yoon Ha Lee wrote:
> No, I think it was specifically discussed when I asked about
> Chevraqis having [b] [t] [d] [k] with no [p] or [g].
Interesting, so you intuitively ended up dropping just those sounds that
are most likely to be dropped if any stops are dropped?
--
Florida: Home of Electile Dysfunction
Palm Beach County: Putting the "duh" in Florida
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTailor