Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: another silly phonology question

From:Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>
Date:Thursday, November 30, 2000, 13:08
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:18:48 -0600, Eric Christopherson
<raccoon@...> wrote:

>Not in English, usually; /t/ and /d/ are alveolar, whereas /T/ and /D/ are >dental (or interdental as some call them). > >Speaking of which, my Spanish professor says that the intervocalic >allophone [D] of /d/ in Spanish is not exactly the same as the voiced >allophone of Castilian /T/. I find this interesting, but I don't know of >any minimal pairs contrasting the two. If anyone else does though, I'd >like to know :) > >Eric Christopherson / *Aiworegs Ghristobhorosyo
I haven't seen a response yet, so I thought I'd stick my oar in and muddy the waters somewhat. I think the difference is that between interdental (Castilian /T/), where the tongue protrudes between the teeth, and dental ([D]), where the tongue touches the back of the teeth. Wouldn't the "minimal pair" actually be a constrast between phonemes (i.e. /T/ and /d/)? What I think you want is a phonetic contrast. I don't recall when /T/ becomes voiced; it may vary from dialect to dialect. Jeff