Re: Odd construct
From: | David Peterson <digitalscream@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 11, 2001, 20:37 |
In a message dated 10/11/01 1:01:19 PM, agricola@WAM.UMD.EDU writes:
<< Ah, but there's a shift in meaning. At least for me, those
two sentences are not equivalent. At least, it would be
a little unnatural sounding to take the meaning of "there"
in the original to be locative:
There are X = X exists (w/o regard to specific place)
X are there = X are currently located in that place
>>
Such is true, but I think the original brings to rise, possibly, the
origin of the phrase, which that got extended metaphorically/semantically.
-David