Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Odd construct

From:Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...>
Date:Thursday, October 11, 2001, 20:28
I think the 'there is' in English is idiomatic.  Other languages use a
different verb or a completely different construct.  Spanish uses "hay," a
form of "haber," to have.  French uses "il y a" (it has to it), another
idiomatic construction.  Hebrew uses "yish," for positive existential
statements, and "ain" for negative ones (and uses these with prepositions
to denote having -- "yish sus li," "There is a horse to me -- I have a
horse".

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Matthew Pearson wrote:

> --- Andrew Chaney wrote: > > If I say spomething along the lines of "There are butterflies", what is > > the subject of the sentence? I've heard it has none. How does this > > work? > > I've always read that (and phrases like it) as an inversion of "Butterflies > are there". Likewise "There's a book on the table" -> "A book is there on > the table". > --- end of quote --- > > This doesn't always work, though. "There is a butterfly here on the table" is > fine, but *"A butterfly is there here on the table" is awful. The "there" > which introduces existential constructions is clearly different from the > "there" which means "to/at that place". > > The problem with existential constructions is that the normal properties > associated with subjects seem to be split between two entities, the "there" > (known in the literature as an 'expletive' or 'dummy' element) and the > indefinite noun phrase following the verb "be" (known as the 'associate' of > the expletive). The associate triggers agreement ("is/was" vs. "are/were"), > while the expletive occupies the normal position for subjects (before the > auxiliary in statements, and immediately after the auxiliary in questions). > There doesn't seem to be any straightforward solution to this dilemma, as far > as identifying which element--the expletive or the associate--is the 'real' > subject. Different linguistics theories opt for different solutions. > > Matt. > > Matt Pearson > Department of Linguistics > Reed College > 3203 SE Woodstock Blvd > Portland, OR 97202 USA > ph: 503-771-1112 (x 7618) >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Prurio modo viri qui in arbore pilosa est. ~~Elvis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~