Re: Website: Old Sanhr

Hi!

I liked it a lot. "Classical pretensions" are for me always welcome. Your
verbal system is truly baroque, even more than mine ; ), and that is good to
see... at work, too! The only problem I see, for us both, is that it is not
that easy to learn, to others and even to ourselves. We have a very strong
need to learn our own language, but... here I confess, I am afraid our
language is too hard for 'common people' to learn, even when they want to.
Of course we need first to finish the grammar and then start to dig a good
didatic way of teaching, but I have this old habit of thinking about
everything at once... poor brain : ).

Anyway, I liked it a lot. Add flesh and it will speak, surely!

Edgard.

On 7/20/06, pag-conlanglist@soapboxindustries.com <
pag-conlanglist@...> wrote:
>
> Hello one and all!
>
> The conlang that I've been working on considerably as of late is on der
> interweb at <a
> href="www.soapboxindustries.com">www.soapboxindustries.com</a>.
>
> I'm quite slow at uploading from brain to paper to binary, but so far I've
> got phonology, pronouns & postpositions, basic verb morphology, and a
> brief overview of the "three-class" system that works on verbal roots
> (accounting for the majority of roots in the language, as well as the only
> productive ones for derivation).
>
> I'm currently focusing on the issue of arguments, so I'll post for help on
> that in the near future.
>
> Thanks ahead of time for all criticism and witticism. It's definitely good
> to be a part of a community, rather than a pariah conlanging out in a
> cabin in the mountains.
>