Gary Shannon wrote:
> Hypothesis: For any natural language, related elements
> are always immediately adjacent and there exists a
> complete fusion grammar for that language.
>
> Comments? Counterexamples?
>
Did you want counterexamples from English?
(did ... want)
Or how about Dutch?
Steek er nu mee de niet-brandende fakkel aan om de deur te openen.
You've got "nu" (now) in the middle of "ermee" (with it), and "aan"
which is part of the word "aansteken" (to light; the sentence refers to
lighting a torch) at the end of the phrase with "steek" at the beginning.