Re: applications
From: | Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 18, 2001, 0:51 |
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 06:02:09PM -0400, Nik Taylor wrote:
> Eric Christopherson wrote:
> > Phono is pretty good, but the syntax of it is a pain (I still haven't
> > figured out the distinction between +/- and #/=)
>
> #/= are obligatory, +/- are optional. If a segment meets all the # and
> = requirements of a phoneme, it'll list it as that, and if it violates
> any of the + or - requirements, it'll note that, by highlighting the
> phone and writing to the said, for example, "+long". But, if a segment
> does not meet the # and = requirements of any phoneme, it'll mark it
> with a question mark
Ah! I *think* that makes sense... I'll have to try to create a phonology for
it and see if that works. Thanks!
--
Eric Christopherson / *Aiworegs Ghristobhorosyo