Re: Trollspeak
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 26, 1999, 18:01 |
Dan Sulani wrote:
> For example, I have never heard, let alone used, in "normally" fast
> English, (my native language) all the syllables in "what are you going
> to do".
> It comes out more like "wVtS gVn du".
Hmm, I usually hear /wVtS@ g@n@ du/. The most I ever hear is probably
/wVt@ j@ gVn@ du/. I don't think you'd *ever* hear /wVt ar ju gow.iN tu
du/ simply because if someone is speaking that carefully, they'll use
the more formal "what will you do?" (/wVt wIl ju du/).
Incidentally, in my (still barely started) idea for Future English,
"gonna" has replaced "will" in the form /N@/, no "to be", so "I nga go"
= "I'm gonna go".
> The difference, IMHO, is not standard versus non-standard, but
> careful
> versus non-careful (_not_ "sloppy", please)
> speech.
Or careful vs. normal speech.
> likehsna rtem zuv tikuhnuh auag inuvuz vaka'a.
>
> A word is an awesome thing.
saga'yu' kla lusaqa'i'yu'
To speak is to create (similar thought)
--
"It's bad manners to talk about ropes in the house of a man whose father
was hanged." - Irish proverb
http://members.tripod.com/~Nik_Taylor/X-Files
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-name: NikTailor