Re: Most developed conlang
| From: | Carsten Becker <carbeck@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, April 19, 2007, 14:01 |
|---|
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:23:56 -0400, Harold Ensle
<heensle@...> wrote:
>Taking words from other languages, by definition, is not "a priori".
>Its true, of course, that languages can have loan words, but I
>got the impression here that it was more pervasive than that.
Under these circumstances, you may not count Verdurian as an a priori
conlang either. Mark Rosenfelder says himself that Verdurian has been
influenced quite a bit by Russian among others.
Regards,
Carsten