Re: Most developed conlang

In a message dated 4/19/2007 5:07:24 AM Central Daylight Time,
conlang@MELROCH.SE writes:


> I don't think vocabulary size is neither objectively
> measurable, unless it means "number of items in online
> vocabulary list", nor a valid indicator of conlang
> 'completeness',
Indeed.  Yiklama has over 90,000 words, based on Wordnet definitions of
English, yet there are lots of words it doesn't have.
Two of the most basic that it doesn't have are "I" and "you", for which it
uses "speaker" and "hearer/listener", which are patently wrong.

stevo   </HTML>

Reply