Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Re : new language; langmaker

From:From Http://Members.Aol.Com/Lassailly/Tunuframe.Html <lassailly@...>
Date:Wednesday, July 21, 1999, 7:20
Dans un courrier dat=E9 du 21/07/99 00:39:54  , Jennifer a =E9crit :

> 25 cases? 25 cases? This is not what I had mind. Again, sigh. > Yeah, I did try to base which cases on Asiteya and that quote. Thanks for=20 > responding. All right, I'll try it, but 25 cases? I wish I could find tha=
t=20
> link to Kelen... > =20 > Jennifer
Sylvia's Kelen is on http://pw2.netcom.com/~sylvia1/ of course you don't need 25 cases. you need as few cases as you think is ok. i was only referring to the range of cases you find in different systems to cope with different "mappings" : x makes y into z x thinks y is z x works on y as a Z etc. but you can skip all that ok. Some conlangs may be helpful to you although they are not allnoun : Kristian's Boreanesian "trigger system" is 3. Joshua's Danov=EBn is excellent to try get rid of PoS (tags). Christophe's Azak has an interesting system whereby nouns can be tagged as "active". Brad's Nova is very different : try its final "smell" list, i'm sure you will like it (guessing from your color names). =20 Asiteya's 10 or 12 cases are enough too, don't you think so ? the only thing is : you may want to use as predicates nouns referring to result (like "wound") and others referring to agent (like "hammer") or to process ("container"). so i think you may need a terminative case "into" (like sumerians had it too ;-) so that you can deal with result, agent and process noun-predicates alike. here is a very stupid example - i'm no masochist ! - where wound is result, hammer is agent and pain a process. it's all c-AP (case-Argument Predicate) and 1 and 2 refer to a pair of attribute-attributee : usedby-Him on-Me into1-Wound into2-Pain Hammer(ing). madeby-Him on-Me with-Hammer into-Pain Wound. madeby1-Him to-Me with-Hammer madeby2-Wound Pain(ing). mathias