Matthew Butt wrote:
> thumbs up !
>
> only thing is, it would be even better tabulated, methinks. but it looks
> like you're coding in raw html, and i know what an a rse tables can be !
Keep in mind that it's not really supposed to look good - it's
supposed to be as convenient as possible to copy-and-paste bits of the
source into other pages, with adequate presentation to help a person
navigate quickly. Tables might well be detrimental because it might
become too easy to accidentally copy-and-paste the table tags along
with the image tags. Tradeoffs and all that.
julien eychenne wrote:
> I just wanted to notice that the tags with description don't work with
> mozilla :(.
If there are ways to make it more browser-independent then I'm
listening.
Adrian.