Re: OT: Star Trek (was RE: Star Trek)
| From: | Joseph Bridwell <darkmoonman@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, May 19, 2006, 14:52 |
|---|
> If we extended the description 'OVS language' to
> include any language where the order OVS _may_ occur,
> then we would almost certainly have a few thousand.
> But this is not the normal, unmarked word order of those
> languages.
True!
Going back to what, IMO, was the actual question: neither the OVS word
order nor the making of pronouns for tense and/or aspect fall outside
the body of human language as a whole.